Area Overview for Palace & Hurlingham Ward

Fulham Palace, Bishop's Park. in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
Hurlingham Park, Fulham, London SW6 in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
Hurlingham Road viewed from Hurlingham Park, London SW6 in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
Hurlingham Road, Fulham in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
Railway bridge, Hurlingham Road in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
Railway bridge across Hurlingham Road in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
All Saints, Fulham High Street - Churchyard in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
Putney Bridge to Parsons Green and back via Hurlingham (16) in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
Rostrevor Road Fulham in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
Munster Road railway bridge in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
Fulham: Clonmel Road, SW6 in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
New Kings Road in Palace & Hurlingham Ward
100 photos from this area

Area Information

Living in Palace & Hurlingham Ward offers a distinctly quiet existence within the London borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. This district covers a compact footprint of just 1.9 square kilometres yet houses a small population of 1,224 residents. Such low density creates an environment that feels separate from the noise of the wider borough. The ward stands apart from the more commercial areas of Hammersmith while remaining firmly within the Greater London context. Daily life here revolves around proximity to green spaces and the need to commute for work, as the ward itself contains very few commercial retail outlets. You will find that the community moves at a slower pace compared to neighbouring districts. The area's size ensures that traffic congestion is rarely a daily obstacle for local residents. However, the geography means you must travel to access most major amenities. Prospective buyers viewing homes in Palace & Hurlingham Ward should note the profound demographic character that defines the streets. This is not a young family area; rather, it is a retirement destination. Compelling evidence of this shift is found in the age profile, which indicates a median age of 70 years. You will notice a neighbourhood populated predominantly by seniors rather than children or young professionals. This demographic concentration shapes the local economy and the upkeep of the housing stock. The small population spread over a tiny area results in low pressure on local infrastructure. Yet, the lack of local shops affects daily convenience. Residents often rely on larger hubs in neighbouring zones for grocery stores and leisure activities. Understanding this context is vital before committing to a purchase in this specific ward.

Area Type
District Borough Unitary Ward
Area Size
1.9 km²
Population
1224
Population Density
642 people/km²

Demographics

The community within Palace & Hurlingham Ward reflects a very specific life stage, defined by an ageing population. The median age of residents is exactly 70 years, a figure that clearly signals this is an area for retirement living rather than family rearing. You will not find many young children playing on the streets, as the household composition is tailored to older adults.的四分之一 of the population falls into the standard adult categories, but the overwhelming majority belong to the senior brackets. Home ownership rates stand at 48 per cent, meaning slightly fewer than half of the households own their freehold or leasehold properties outright. The remaining residents likely rent their accommodation, creating a mix of owner-occupied and private or social rental sectors. This balance influences how much direct control residents have over their immediate surroundings. Ethnic and religious diversity statistics are not detailed in the available figures, so the social fabric appears homogeneous in its current recorded data. The population density of 642 people per square kilometre confirms a comfortable, uncrowded living standard. This density is roughly one-third of the London average, ensuring ample personal space in homes and gardens. The household types are likely skewed towards single-occupancy or couple-based arrangements, fitting the high median age. If you are considering buying homes in this area, expect to join a community accustomed to quiet, if you prefer a bustling, youth-centric environment. The demographic reality means local events and services are likely curated towards the needs of the elderly, such as specific health screenings or social clubs. You should verify whether these amenities align with your lifestyle requirements before viewing properties here.

Household Size

total
most common

Accommodation Type

total
most common

Tenure

48
majority

Ethnic Group

total
most common

Religion

total
most common

Household Composition

total
most common

Age

70
median
Age: Total
most common

Household Deprivation

N/A
with no deprivation

NS-SEC

52
in Lower managerial occupations

Explore more demographic insights in this area

Go to Demographics tab

Planning

Planning Constraints

  • Flood Risk
    Premium
  • Ramsar Wetland Sites
    Premium
  • Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
    Premium
  • Protected Nature Reserve
    Premium
  • Protected Woodland
    Premium
  • Crime Risk
    Premium

Explore more planning insights in this area

Open Planning map

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the demographic profile of Palace & Hurlingham Ward?
The community is overwhelmingly composed of older adults, with a median age of 70 years. The population of 1,224 residents creates a quiet retirement-focused environment rather than a young family area. This high median age defines the character of the ward.
How is the connectivity for remote workers in Palace & Hurlingham Ward?
Digital infrastructure is excellent, with a fixed broadband quality score of 88 out of 100. This reliable high-speed connection is ideal for working from home. Residents can expect minimal disruption to their daily digital routine despite the area's limited local commercial hubs.
Is Palace & Hurlingham Ward a safe place to live?
The area has a low crime risk, reflected in a safety score of 74 out of 100. This indicates below-average crime rates within the borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. The passive assessment of flood risk is also critical, with a score of 99.7 showing virtually no threat of water-related damage.

We use cookies to provide you with the best experience. By continuing, you agree to our Cookie Policy .